As far as showdowns go, Cypress vs. Selenium may not rank up there with Muhammad Ali vs. Joe Frazier, but comparing these two automated cross-browser testing tools can help you pick the best one for the job. For many years, Selenium was the go-to for automated web application testing, and it’s still the most widely used tool. However, Cypress has emerged as a new contender and has been quickly gaining adoption. This guide will compare the various features of Cypress vs. Selenium so you can make an informed decision.
Table of Contents
Selenium: Why Do We Need It?
Any comparison of Cypress vs. Selenium should include an overview of what Selenium is and why it’s used. Selenium is used for testing web applications to make sure they work as expected across different browsers and platforms. By automating the actions that a user might perform when interacting with a website, Selenium helps identify issues and bugs in the application during the development phase. Automated testing maintains the quality and performance of web applications, especially in fast-paced, agile development environments where manual testing can be time-consuming and prone to human error.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Selenium
Selenium’s strengths include its versatility, multi-language support, and extensive cross-browser compatibility. However, the features that make it so flexible also make it more complex and harder to use. When you’re comparing Cypress vs. Selenium, here are some of Selenium’s pros and cons to keep in mind.
Advantages of Selenium
In comparing Cypress vs. Selenium, consider Selenium’s strong points:
- Cross-browser compatibility: Selenium supports various browsers, including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, and Safari.
- Open source: Being open source, Selenium is free to use and has a large community and lots of support resources.
- Platform portability: Tests can be executed for different operating systems like Windows, Mac, and Linux, so you can run it in multiple development environments.
- Integration: Selenium integrates well with tools for continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) and other testing frameworks.
- Flexibility and scalability: With its modular approach to testing, you can write scripts for simple to complex test cases and scale testing efforts as needed.
Disadvantages of Selenium
When considering why we need testing in Selenium, you should also think about the following negatives. Having the complete picture will help you decide whether to use Cypress vs. Selenium:
- No built-in reporting or test management: Selenium doesn’t have built-in reporting and test management capabilities. You’ll need to integrate it with other tools, which can add complexity to the testing setup.
- Steep learning curve: While powerful, Selenium can be complex to learn, especially if you aren’t familiar with programming and testing concepts.
- Browser control limitations: Selenium interacts with web elements but has limitations in handling browser pop-ups, new window tabs, and elements that are disabled or not visible.
- Time-consuming for complex tests: Writing scripts for complex test scenarios can be time-consuming and may require advanced programming skills.
- Limited support for image testing: Selenium is not ideally suited for testing images. It focuses on functional testing and might require additional tools for visual testing.
Cypress Automation for Web Testing
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cypress
Cypress’ fast adoption rate is a testament to how much developers love its fast API, end-to-end testing, and front-end testing. However, in a Cypress vs. Selenium comparison, one of its main drawbacks is its limited language and browser support. Here’s a look at the positives and negatives of Cypress in more detail.
Advantages of Cypress
In a Cypress vs. Selenium comparison, the following features lean in Cypress’ favor:
- Real-time testing: Cypress runs tests in the same run loop as the application, offering real-time, faster test execution and feedback.
- Ease of setup and use: It is easier to set up compared to some other testing frameworks, and its syntax is straightforward, making tests easier to write and understand.
- Automatic waiting: Cypress automatically waits for commands and assertions before moving on. This reduces the flakiness of tests caused by timing issues.
- Debuggability: Cypress provides excellent debugging capabilities through readable error messages, and allows you to directly debug from the Developer Tools.
- Consistent results: Tests in Cypress are less prone to flakiness and are more reliable due to its architecture and handling of asynchronous events.
- Integrated development environment: Cypress includes a test runner that allows you to see commands as they execute while also viewing the application under testing.
Disadvantages of Cypress
The following negatives might sway your decision about Cypress vs. Selenium:
- Browser support: Cypress currently has limited browser support, mainly focused on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Electron, which can be a drawback for comprehensive cross-browser testing.
- Limited multi-tab support: Cypress does not support testing across multiple tabs or multiple browsers in a single test, which can be limiting for certain test scenarios.
- No native mobile support: Cypress is designed for testing web applications and doesn’t support native mobile application testing.
- Large video and screenshot files: Cypress records videos of test runs, which can be large and consume significant disk space.
Cypress vs. Selenium: A Head-to-Head Comparison
Here’s a detailed breakdown of Cypress vs. Selenium regarding popular features:
|Operates directly within the browser and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested to allow for faster execution and real-time testing feedback
|Runs outside the browser and controls the browser through a driver, which can lead to slower execution and may introduce issues with synchronization
|Initially focused on Chrome but has expanded to support Firefox and Edge
|Extensive browser support, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge, making it a better choice for comprehensive cross-browser testing
|Test Runner and Framework
|Comes with its own test runner and assertions library, providing an all-in-one solution but less flexibility in choosing different testing frameworks or assertion libraries
|Requires integration with test runners and assertion libraries (like JUnit or TestNG), offering more flexibility but also requiring more setup
|Offers easier setup with fewer dependencies, making it more accessible for quick startup and use
|More complex to set up, especially when integrating with various languages and frameworks
|Execution Speed and Feedback
|Faster test execution and immediate visual feedback — good for debugging and development
|Tests can be slower and may not offer the same level of immediate feedback, particularly in complex test suites
|Automatically waits for elements to become visible, commands to complete, and AJAX calls to finish, reducing flakiness in tests
|Requires explicit waits and handling of asynchronous operations, which can lead to more flaky tests if not managed properly
|Community and Ecosystem
|Growing community and ecosystem, but it’s relatively newer and smaller compared to Selenium
|Large, well-established community and ecosystem, with extensive resources and support available
How to Choose Between Cypress and Cypress Alternatives
If speed is your biggest concern, Cypress is the clear winner. On the other hand, if you need to run tests in browsers that Cypress doesn’t support, you’ll have to use Selenium. Ultimately, you’ll need to look at the needs of your project to pick between Cypress vs. Selenium. Cypress performs better than Selenium in many use cases but isn’t as flexible.
When you’re building web applications, you have a lot of decisions to make. Picking the best option between Cypress vs. Selenium is just one of them. Gathering data through web scraping can help you in many aspects of your projects. Web scraping uses automated bots to crawl web pages, extract data, and export it into a readable format so you can analyze it.
Scraping Robot is a code-free, cost-effective alternative to building your own web scraper. Scraping Robot’s scraper and API take care of all of the hassles associated with scraping so you can get started immediately. You don’t need a proxy for Selenium or any other proxies because Scraping Robot takes care of proxy management for you. Sign up today to get started for free.
The information contained within this article, including information posted by official staff, guest-submitted material, message board postings, or other third-party material is presented solely for the purposes of education and furtherance of the knowledge of the reader. All trademarks used in this publication are hereby acknowledged as the property of their respective owners.